Exploring the Influence of an Interprofessional Student-Run Clinic on Matriculation to Health Professional School: A Retrospective Cross-Sectional Study

Erik Vanstrum; Sukriti Mohan; Janis Yue; Daniella Veloria; Justin  Quon; Renee Lee; Kevin  Knox; Cha Chi Fung

doi:10.59586/jsrc.v8i1.307

Erik B Vanstrum University of Southern California https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8052-4327
Sukriti Mohan, MPH University of Southern California
Janis Yue, MA University of Southern California
Daniella Veloria University of Southern California
Justin C Quon University of Southern California
Renee Lee, MS University of Southern California
Kevin M Knox University of Washington
Cha Chi Fung, PhD University of Southern California

DOI: https://doi.org/10.59586/jsrc.v8i1.307

Keywords: Vulnerable Populations, Minority Groups, Interprofessional Education, LGTBQIA

Abstract

Background: Projected demographic trends in the United States suggest increasing racial and ethnic diversity. It is important that the healthcare workforce reflects these trends to reduce healthcare disparities among underserved populations. For example, concordant backgrounds between patients and providers improve communication and increase probability that patients seek and receive healthcare among marginalized populations. Building in curricular opportunities to connect with the underserved community is one way to recruit students from diverse backgrounds into this pipeline that will lead to a diverse workforce in healthcare. The objective of this study was to assess the influence of an interdisciplinary student-run clinic (SRC), which focuses on caring for underserved and vulnerable populations, on students’ decisions to matriculate in four health professional programs (medical, occupational therapy, pharmacy, and physician assistant) at a single institution.

Methods: In this retrospective cross-sectional survey study, we examined factors influencing first-year students’ decisions to attend a private university in a large metropolitan area. The primary outcome was students’ self-reported ratings of the university’s SRC as a factor in their matriculation decisions. Two-tailed Mann-Whitney-U tests was applied to compare the relative importance of SRC on matriculation. Free response data were evaluated by a qualitative content approach.

Results: A total of 419 students completed the survey (73% completion rate) across the 4 programs. We found that underrepresented minorities in medicine (URM) (p < 0.05) and first-generation (p < 0.01) students rated the importance of an SRC on their matriculation decision significantly higher than non-URM and non-first-generation students.

Conclusions: Our findings suggest that the presence of an SRC may positively impact matriculation decisions and diversification of the student body across certain health professional disciplines.